Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Combined Radiation-Protective and Radiation-Sensitizing Agents: II. Radiosensitivity of Hypoxic or Aerobic Chinese Hamster Fibroblasts in the Presence of Cysteamine and Misonidazole: Implications for the "Oxygen Effect" (With Appendix on Calculation of Dose-Modifying Factors)

Authors: C J, Koch; R L, Howell;

Combined Radiation-Protective and Radiation-Sensitizing Agents: II. Radiosensitivity of Hypoxic or Aerobic Chinese Hamster Fibroblasts in the Presence of Cysteamine and Misonidazole: Implications for the "Oxygen Effect" (With Appendix on Calculation of Dose-Modifying Factors)

Abstract

Experiments have been done to test whether a hypoxic cell radiosensitizing agent (misonidazole) can be combined with a radioprotecting agent (cysteamine) to equalize partially the radiation response of hypoxic and aerobic mammalian cells in tissue culture. The results indicate that cysteamine will protect against the radiosensitization of a hypoxic cell sensitizing drug (2.5 mM misonidazole) at much lower concentration than it will protect against the radiosensitization of oxygen (350 ..mu..M). Thus the addition of a radiation-protective drug tends to cancel the drug benefit of the radiosensitizer and therefore increases the differential response of hypoxic and aerobic cells rather than equalizing this response. The data suggest that even in situations where tumor tissue absorbs far less radioprotective drug than normal tissue (e.g., WR 2721), one might expect difficulties with the simultaneous administration of radiosensitizing and radioprotecting drugs.

Keywords

Cell Survival, Cysteamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Radiation Tolerance, Oxygen, Cricetulus, Nitroimidazoles, Cricetinae, Animals, Misonidazole, Cells, Cultured, Mathematics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    62
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
62
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!