
Almost nothing is known of P. caniceps (Avise et al., 1974; Hooper, 1968). According to Burt (1932), it is similar in some respects and undoubtedly belongs to the same group as P.pseudocrinitus; however, P. caniceps appears to be a distinct species. It differs radically in coloration from P. pseudocrinitus, and the skull is distinct with zygomatic processes of the squamosalprojecting laterally beyond the border of the braincase and tapering nasals, and differs in relative length of the shelf of the bony palate and the maxillary tooth row. Averagemeasurements (in rom) of sixteen adults (Burt, 1932) are as follows: total length, 202; length of tail, 112; length of hind foot, 22; length of ear from notch, 15.5; greatest length of skull, 25.7; condylobasallength, 22.9; basilar length of Hensel, 19.5; zygomatic breadth, 13.2; least interorbital constriction, 4.0; length and width of interparietal, 9.3 by 4.0; length of nasals, 9.4; length of shelf of bony palate, 4.0; and length of maxillary tooth row, 3.8.
Ecology, Conservation status, FOS: Biological sciences, Rodentia, Distribution
Ecology, Conservation status, FOS: Biological sciences, Rodentia, Distribution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
