
doi: 10.2307/3342005
pmid: 7153359
UCH of the effort to reduce our vulnerability to cancer is directed toward an application of the regulatory process to the identification of persons at high risk and the reduction of their exposures to toxic substances for which there is evidence of carcinogenic potential. This process may be viewed as consisting of a number of essentially sequential steps: the gathering and evaluation of data on toxicity, on use, on human exposure and economic factors; the balancing of benefits-long-term and short-term-and costs, followed by implementation of the decision; and the control process. Despite the regulatory authority to accomplish these steps, progress has been slow in setting standards and in carrying out other activities to prevent the development of neoplasms that would, at later stages, threaten life or health. Resources available to regulatory agencies are often limited compared to the magnitude of the problem, and the current ad hoc approach to the regulation of toxic agents will probably continue for the foreseeable future because of constraints in scientific knowledge, laboratory personnel, technical personnel, technical resources, and the complexity of socioeconomic, political, and legal factors to be considered. The scope of these issues is much too great to be reviewed in a single presentation. This paper shall, therefore, be illustrative rather than comprehensive in the topics addressed. TSCA IMPLEMENTATION
Risk, Legislation as Topic, United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States, Structure-Activity Relationship, Mutation, Carcinogens, Humans, Environmental Pollution
Risk, Legislation as Topic, United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States, Structure-Activity Relationship, Mutation, Carcinogens, Humans, Environmental Pollution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
