Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Differences in the Second Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS-2) of Eight Species of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Ruminants

Authors: M, Heise; C, Epe; T, Schnieder;

Differences in the Second Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS-2) of Eight Species of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Ruminants

Abstract

Genetic differences in the nucleotide sequence of the second internal transcribed spacers (ITS-2) among Trichostrongylus axei, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Ostertagia ostertagi, Cooperia oncophora, Cooperia punctata, Nematodirus helvetianus, Nematodirus filicollis, and Haemonchus contortus are described. The ITS-2 sequences of the 8 species ranged between 230 and 241 base pairs in length. Sequence similarities between the different genera varied between 60% and 80%. Identities between the different species within a genus varied between 99% for C. oncophora and C. punctata, 95% for T. axei and T. colubriformis, and 89% for N. helvetianus and N. filicollis. The ITS-2 sequences proved to be useful for species differentiation. Except for the species of Cooperia (2.07% intraspecific variations for C. oncophora and 0.83% for C. punctata) the degree of intraspecific variations (N. filicollis 0.85%, T. colubriformis 1.26%, T. axei 1.27%, H. contortus 2.60%, O. ostertagi, and N. helvetianus no variation) was markedly lower than the interspecific variations allowing a reliable differentiation within the ITS-2 region between single species.

Keywords

Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, Base Sequence, Trichostrongyloidea, Molecular Sequence Data, Genetic Variation, Ruminants, DNA, Helminth, DNA, Ribosomal, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Trichostrongyloidiasis, Species Specificity, Animals, Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, Sequence Alignment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!