Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Non-specificity of the Generalized Amoebocytic Reaction in Lymnaea truncatula Infected by Fasciola hepatica

Authors: D, Rondelaud; Y, Faucher; D, Barthe;

The Non-specificity of the Generalized Amoebocytic Reaction in Lymnaea truncatula Infected by Fasciola hepatica

Abstract

showed a significantly greater number of larvae than the refractory genotype at days 5 and 8 (t = 4.536, P < 0.001 at 5 days; ROCK = 0 L3's at 8 days). Our results indicate that a susceptible mosquito genotype will maintain a higher infection (88%) and support a greater number of larvae (overall mean= 13.06) than a refractory genotype (44% susceptible; mean larvae = 9.76). Both genotypes initially show high infections (BLACK EYE = 100% susceptible; ROCK = 88%). However, significant differences in filarial development occur 2-3 days post-infection, with the refractory genotype demonstrating a much greater decrease in susceptibility and number of developing larvae. Eight days post-infection several larvae will approach complete development in a susceptible genotype. By contrast, most larvae are eliminated by the fifth day in a refractory genotype (Table I). Similar changes in filarial development were also obtained by Morison (1973, M.S. Thesis, Univ. Texas Schl. Publ. Hlth, Houston, Texas) and by Rodriguez et al. (unpubl. data) when specific susceptible and refractory genotypes of Ae. aegypti were infected with B. pahangi. The authors thank Prof. George B. Craig, Jr., Director of the WHO International Reference Centre for Aedes, University of Notre Dame, for supplying the BLACK EYE and ROCK strains. The strain of B. malayi was from infected jirds obtained from Dr. John McCall, University of Georgia through the U.S.-Japan Co-operative Medical Science Program-NIAID. This study was supported in part by NIH Research Grant No. RR-08194-04.

Keywords

Viruses, Animals, Fasciola hepatica, Lymnaea

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!