Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Hyperparasitism in Ornithodoros erraticus

Authors: N, Helmy; G M, Khalil; H, Hoogstraal;

Hyperparasitism in Ornithodoros erraticus

Abstract

Hyperparasitism is common in laboratory colonies of Egyptian Ornithodoros erraticus whether the ticks are on or off the rodent host. Sex, recent engorgement, and size appear to be major factors in this feeding relationship. Males, and nymphs that produced males (N-male), parasitized females and nymphs that produced females (N-female) more frequently than they parasitized males and N-male. Females and N-female seldom parasitized females and N-female and did not parasitize males or N-male. Engorging and recently engorged, large ticks attracted smaller unfed ones. No preferred attachment site was observed. Hyperparasitizing females and parasitized females weighed less, had a longer preoviposition period, and produced fewer eggs than normally feeding, unparasitized females. About 30% and 80% of the females parasitized by males and females, respectively, died within 3 mo; only 7% of unparasitized females died within the same period. The proximity of replete or engorging ticks may be sufficient stimulus for hyperparasitism. Additional factors may include production of an attracting kairomone by fed ticks or the absence under certain conditions of a deterrent to hyperparasitism normally produced by fed ticks. Borrelia crocidurae spirochetes are transmitted during hyperparasitism.

Keywords

Male, Ticks, Borrelia, Cricetinae, Body Weight, Animals, Female, Feeding Behavior

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!