Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparative Studies on Ancylostoma braziliense and Ancylostoma ceylanicum. II. The Infective Larval Stage

Authors: Y, Yoshida;

Comparative Studies on Ancylostoma braziliense and Ancylostoma ceylanicum. II. The Infective Larval Stage

Abstract

The infective larva of Ancylostoma braziliense Gomes de Faria, 1910, was compared with that of A. ceylanicum Looss, 1911, as seen with the light microscope and scanning electron microscope. The following differences were found: (1) With or without the sheath, A. ceylanicum is significantly longer than A. braziliense. (2) The distances from anus to caudal tip of the body and from there to the tip of the sheath are both significantly greater in A. ceylanicum than in A. braziliense. (3) The transverse striations on the sheath are more pronounced in A. ceylanicum than in A. braziliense. These findings further demonstrate that A. braziliense and A. ceylanicum are distinct species, and show that their infective-stage larvae are easily distinguishable. Considerations of the synonymy of Ancylostoma ceylanicum Looss, 1911, and Ancylostoma braziliense Gomes de Faria, 1910, have usually been based on the morphology of the adult worms (Yoshida, 1971). Few observations have been made on the morphology of these two ancylostomes in the infective larval stage, although Kobayashi (1928) in Taiwan made measurements on A. ceylanicum infective larvae and compared them with those of A. duodenale, A. caninum, and Necator americanus. The present investigation was carried out in an attempt to clarify the larval morphology of A. braziliense and A. ceylanicum, and to determine the features by which the two species can be differentiated in the infective stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS The strains of A. braziliense and A. ceylanicum used in the present research were the same as those studied earlier (Yoshida, 1971). The infective larvae were obtained by cultivation (HaradaMori method) of eggs in feces from dogs having pure infections. They were examined 2 to 3 weeks after initiation of the cultures, both with the light microscope and with the scanning electron microscope. Prior to examination with the light microscope the larvae in a drop of water on a slide were killed by heat, then covered with a coverglass. They were examined within 15 min after heat fixation. For study with the scanning electron microscope, the larvae were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde for 1 hr, then dehydrated with acetone. The dry materials were coated first with carbon then with gold in the vacuum chamber. The microscope used was a JSM-2 model of Japan Electron Optics Company. Received for publication 18 March 1971. RESULTS

Keywords

Ancylostoma, Dogs, Larva, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!