
doi: 10.2307/3146855
We empirically investigate the ef- fect of the payment mechanism on contingent val- ues by asking a willingness-to-pay question with one of three different payment mechanisms: indi- vidual contribution, contribution with provision point, and referendum. We e nd statistical evi- dence of more afe rmative responses in the refer- endum treatment relative to the individual contri- bution treatment, some weak statistical evidence of more afe rmative responses in the referendum treatment relative to the provision point treat- ment, and no statistical evidence of more afe r- mative responses in the provision point treatment relative to the individual contribution treatment. The relative credibility of the three payment mechanisms is also examined . (JEL H41, Q26)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 79 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
