For Jurisprudential Sociology

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 1976 English Publisher:Cambridge University Press (CUP)Journal:Law & Society Review, volume 10, pages 525-545 (issn: 0023-9216, eissn: 1540-5893,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Philippe Nonet;

doi: 10.2307/3053296

For Jurisprudential Sociology

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Ten years ago, in the first issue of this review, Carl A. Auerbach criticized some early statements of an emerging “Berkeley perspective” in the sociology of law (Auerbach, 1966). Selznick, Skolnick, Carlin, and I were chided for proposing in various terms that a central concern of the sociology of law should be to study the social foundations of the ideal of legality (Selznick, 1961; 1968; Skolnick, 1965; Carlin and Nonet, 1968).

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	13
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average