Photoperiodic changes, if occurring before a commitment to flowering is established, can alter the morphological pattern of plant development. In this study, Glycine max (L.) Merrill cv. Ransom plants were initially grown under an inductive short‐day (SD) photoperiod to promote flower evocation and then transferred to a long‐day (LD) photoperiod to delay flower development by reestablishing vegetative growth (SD–LD plants). Some plants were transferred back to SD after 4‐LD exposures to repromote flowering (SD–LD–SD plants). Alterations in organ initiation patterns, from floral to vegetative and back to floral, are characteristic of a reversion phenomenon. Morphological features that occurred at the shoot apical meristem in SD, LD, SD–LD, and SD–LD–SD plants were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Reverted plants initiated floral bracts and resumed initiation of trifoliolate leaves in the two‐fifths floral phyllotaxy prior to terminal inflorescence development. When these plants matured, leaf‐bract intermediates were positioned on the main stem instead of trifoliolate leaves. Plants transferred back to a SD photoperiod flowered earlier than those left in LD conditions. Results indicated that in plants transferred between SDs and LDs, photoperiod can influence organ initiation in florally evoked, but not committed, G. max plants.