
doi: 10.2307/2555656
pmid: 10296625
* The field of industrial organization has been transformed during the past twenty years. In the 1950s and 1960s, I.O. was predominantly an empirical field with little theory to guide either industry analysis or cross-section regression studies. During the 1980s, by contrast, there has been an intense flurry of activity in I.O. devoted to the development of new theory. This new wave of research consists almost exclusively of game-theoretic studies of behavior and performance in imperfectly competitive markets. In his companion piece Franklin Fisher argues that the game-theoretic approach to industrial organization has been unsuccessful. My aim here is to provide one participant's view of what industrial organization economists have learned from the recent theoretical research and where the field of industrial organization should go during the 1990s.
Economic Competition, Economics, Commerce, Investments, United States
Economic Competition, Economics, Commerce, Investments, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 224 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
