
doi: 10.2307/2554638
This paper presents a parametric model that explains why individuals choose to trade with an intermediary. This choice is based on a comparison of the gain from trading with the intermediary with the expected gain from entering a matching process where individuals can choose to be direct buyers, direct sellers, or nonparticipants. The intermediary provides a service by making the product more liquid by lowering the probability of an unsuccessful trade. However, the individuals who choose to remain direct traders are made worse-off by the existence of the intermediary. Copyright 1996 by The London School of Economics and Political Science.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
