
doi: 10.2307/2532940
pmid: 7662841
Two methods are given for the joint estimation of parameters in models for competing risks in survival analysis. In both cases Cox's proportional hazards regression model is fitted using a data duplication method. In principle either method can be used for any number of different failure types, assuming independent risks. Advantages of the augmented data approach are that it limits over-parametrisation and it runs immediately on existing software. The methods are used to reanalyse data from two well-known published studies, providing new insights.
Graft Rejection, Male, Analysis of Variance, Models, Statistical, Time Factors, Prostatic Neoplasms, Survival Analysis, Risk Factors, Neoplasms, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Diethylstilbestrol, Mathematics, Software, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Graft Rejection, Male, Analysis of Variance, Models, Statistical, Time Factors, Prostatic Neoplasms, Survival Analysis, Risk Factors, Neoplasms, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Diethylstilbestrol, Mathematics, Software, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 897 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
