
An ultrastructural examination of hypodermal cell walls failed to demonstrate the presence of casparian strips as has been reported in the literature. Rather, these cells have supportive phi‐thickenings which differ significantly from casparian strips. Adjacent phi‐thickenings are convex‐convex and stratified in transection, with an uneven surface like the rest of the phi‐cell's wall. They may be unbranched or branched and in the latter case, especially, they may appear on tangential as well as radial and transverse walls. They are lignified early in development and are associated with microtubules which lie parallel to the long axis of the thickening. Further, the plasmalemma exhibits no special adherence to the thickened wall region. In each of these and other characteristics phi‐thickenings contrast sharply with casparian strips.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
