Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Studies on the Trematode Family Brachycoeliidae, II. Revision of the Genera Glypthelmins (Stafford, 1900) Stafford, 1905, and Margeana Cort, 1919; and the Description of Reynoldstrema n. gen. (Glypthelminae n. subfam.)

Authors: Thomas C. Cheng;

Studies on the Trematode Family Brachycoeliidae, II. Revision of the Genera Glypthelmins (Stafford, 1900) Stafford, 1905, and Margeana Cort, 1919; and the Description of Reynoldstrema n. gen. (Glypthelminae n. subfam.)

Abstract

This paper represents the second of a monographic series on the trematode family Brachycoeliidae Johnston, 1912. In Part I (Cheng, 1957) the author referred to this family of flukes as members of the subfamily Brachycoeliinae Looss, 1899; however, at that time he stated that he agreed with Fuhrmann (1928) ". . . in retaining Brachycoeliinae as a subfamily under Dicrocoeliidae until additional evidences can indicate differently." Since the appearance of Part I, the life history of Brachycoelium obesum Nicoll, 1914 has been satisfactorily established and that of B. salamandrae (Frolich, 1789) has been partially established. The information obtained from these life cycles strongly suggest that the subfamily Brachycoeliinae should be granted independent status as the family Brachycoeliidae as suggested by Johnston (1912), since the life histories of the Brachycoelium spp. indicate the presence of only one intermediate host (the entire life histories will be published at a later date) which differs sharply from the life cycles of either the Dicrocoeliidae or the Plagiorchiidae where two intermediate hosts exist. Since Rankin's (1944) description of the life cycle of Glypthelmins quieta contained only one intermediate host, this further suggests the close relationship between Glypthelmins and Brachycoelium, hence the author has chosen to assign the genera covered in Part I and those included in Part II as members of the independent family Brachycoeliidae. Inasmuch as the members of the genus Brachycoelium are different from those of Glypthelmins and Margeana (see Cheng, 1957) the author has chosen to retain the subfamily Brachycoeliinae Looss, 1899 under Brachycoeliidae to include Brachycoelium and has erected the Glypthelminae n. subfam., also unider Brachycoeliidae, to include Glypthelmins, Margeana and Reynoldstrema. This present paper consists of a revision of Glypthelmins (Stafford, 1900) Stafford, 1905, the re-establishment of Margeana Cort, 1919 as a valid genus, and the description of Reynoldstrema n. gen. The descriptions of the various species of the genera considered, have been restricted to the essentials for the sake of brevity. The original type drawings have been included to aid in the diagnosis of specimens. The genera Glypthelmins and Margeana are extremely closely

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!