
doi: 10.2307/2391183
As a legislative organization, the United States Congress has come increasingly to be characterized by the size and expertise of its committee staffs. Primarily based upon extensive interviews with congressional staff personnel, this paper deals with four major questions: In recent decades, how have committee staffs developed? Who are the major users of committee staff personnel? What are the main capabilities of committee staffs? And, what are the principal biases or constraints in the congressional context which shape the behavior of staff personnel? Congressional committee staffs have grown considerably in size in the postwar years, their work is mainly oriented to the committee members themselves, the committee staffs have come to be very influential, and the boundaries of their activities are well-defined by the constraints operating in the congressional institution.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
