Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

"Cost-Utility" as a Measure of the Efficiency of a Test

Authors: J, BERKSON;

"Cost-Utility" as a Measure of the Efficiency of a Test

Abstract

Abstract Frequently a test result or measure x applying to an individual is used to “predict” not a quantity y of the individual, but instead, whether the individual belongs to A or B of two mutually exclusive categories. The question discussed is how to measure the effectiveness of the test x in achieving the dichotomization. Measures such as the biserial or tetrachoric r are considered open to objection on conceptual and operational grounds. A method is advanced that consists in determining (1) the utility, defined as the fraction of individuals actually belonging to category A which the test correctly designates as A and (2) the cost defined as the fraction of individuals actually belonging to category B which the test incorrectly designates as A. Two tests are to be compared on the basis of their comparative costs for the same utility. When a test can be used at any utility, an over-all measure of effectiveness is the mean-cost (M.C.) for all utilities. Derived from this is an index, the mean-cost-rat...

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biometry, Statistics as Topic, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Efficiency

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 0.1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!