
pmid: 20252914
Abstract Frequently a test result or measure x applying to an individual is used to “predict” not a quantity y of the individual, but instead, whether the individual belongs to A or B of two mutually exclusive categories. The question discussed is how to measure the effectiveness of the test x in achieving the dichotomization. Measures such as the biserial or tetrachoric r are considered open to objection on conceptual and operational grounds. A method is advanced that consists in determining (1) the utility, defined as the fraction of individuals actually belonging to category A which the test correctly designates as A and (2) the cost defined as the fraction of individuals actually belonging to category B which the test incorrectly designates as A. Two tests are to be compared on the basis of their comparative costs for the same utility. When a test can be used at any utility, an over-all measure of effectiveness is the mean-cost (M.C.) for all utilities. Derived from this is an index, the mean-cost-rat...
Biometry, Statistics as Topic, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Efficiency
Biometry, Statistics as Topic, Costs and Cost Analysis, Humans, Efficiency
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
