
doi: 10.2307/2230745
Problems of inequality related to the disaggregation of Gini coefficients are examined. Measures of inequality can be decomposed so that in a grouped population, total inequality depends on inequality within and between groups. No such decomposition is available for the Gini coefficient, yet its direct relationship to the Lorenz curve has resulted in persistent attempts to derive a disaggregation that can be used in empirical work. The Gini coefficient can be interpreted in terms of the average expected gain from having the option of receiving the income of some other random individual. Variation within the components of the expression for the Gini coefficient contributes to overall inequality. The decomposition of the Gini coefficient further identifies the inequality within a population and may have particular relevance to studies of migration and discrimination. If migration includes movement from one income group to another or a change in educational status, the migration can be viewed in terms of expected gains for those individuals who are migrating. These expected gains for individuals can then be considered in terms of a statistical game framework. Statistical data are included. 12 references.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 320 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
