Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Blocking Family Planning

Authors: J I, Rosoff;

Blocking Family Planning

Abstract

Reviews the history and development of the national family planning program and the means by which it has been funded and the current administrations proposals with regard to issues affecting family planning. The issue of block grants to states versus categorical federal funding is of special concern. The author concludes that the existing program should not be buried in block grants to states because experience indicates that this funding mechanism will not generate a nationwide program of services. The categorical approach has succeeded in creating and maintaining a flexible and cost effective program accountable to Congress the executive branch and the public. Funds provided in this way are responsible for nearly 1/2 of public support for the family planning clinic program which was estimated to have averted 5.4 million unintended pregnancies during the 1970s. Block grants would mean severe diminution of this support and would destroy the accountability and visibility which have guaranteed the programs effectiveness. Additionally the Center for Population Research which is responsible for funding most of the worlds investigations into new contraceptive methods and evaluation of existing methods would be jeopardized.

Keywords

Financing, Government, Family Planning Services, Humans, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!