Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Tubal Sterilization and Hysterectomy

Authors: J H, Johnson;

Tubal Sterilization and Hysterectomy

Abstract

Reports on and summarizes a number of papers presented at the 1981 annual meeting of the American Public Health Association that addressed morbidity and mortality associated with hysterectomy and sterilization. 2 studies from the Centers for Disease Control indicate a high degree of morbidity associated with hysterectomy and a 90% higher rate of complications for abdominal than for vaginal procedures with an overall mortality rate of 1.15 per 1000 procedures. 4 studies on tubal sterilization indicate a good safety record (a serious complication rate of 1.7 per 100 women having interval laparoscopies and an overall mortality rate of 4 per 100 thousand) together with a low failure rate of 2.5 pregnancies per 1000 sterilized women after 1 year. Women receiving Medicaid have nearly 2 to 4 times higher rates of sterilization than the general population. Additional studies on diagnoses leading to hysterectomy on complications of hysterectomy and sterilization and on statistics related to Medicaid sterilizations are also described and summarized.

Keywords

Risk, Medicaid, Pregnancy, Sterilization, Tubal, Hysterectomy, Vaginal, Humans, Female, Length of Stay, Hysterectomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!