
doi: 10.2307/2109552
A procedure is proposed to test for the existence of a fully causal relationship between two variables. The method involves contrasting the probabilistic forecasting performance of a univariate and bivariate specification for the same variable Y. If there exists some theory or belief that X causes Y, and the addition of a variable X to the information set of a prequential forecasting system for a variable Y reduces miscalibration and/or the level of forecast uncertainty with respect Y's distribution for the next period, then a fully causal effect running from X to Y may be inferred. Vector autoregression allows testing for feedback. The method is to be applied to the issue of causality between the live cattle futures market and a major slaughter cattle cash market. Copyright 1992 by MIT Press.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
