Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Mental Hospitalization as a Reinforcement Process

Authors: W W, Eaton;

Mental Hospitalization as a Reinforcement Process

Abstract

The number of times individuals diagnosed as schizophrenic are hospitalized varies greatly. Four theoretical models are proposed to account for the variation. The positive reinforcement model proposes that individuals are positively reinforced at each episode, and is consonant with theories of institutionalization. The negative reinforcement model proposes that individuals are negatively reinforced at each episode, and is in aggreement with the idea of therapeutic efficacy. The heterogeneity model proposes that individual differences account for the variation. The pure random model proposes that the differences are explained by a random process. A negative binomial distribution, consonant with both the positive reinforcement and the heterogeneity model, is fit to the distribution of numbers of hospital episodes of schizophrenia for a cohort from the Maryland Psychiatric Case Register. Correlations between occurrence of episodes in early years with occurrence of episodes in later years also suggests that the pure random and the negative reinforcement models are not operative. Further analysis suggests that the heterogeneity model is the correct one.

Keywords

Maryland, Models, Psychological, Hospitalization, Schizophrenia, Humans, Reinforcement, Psychology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!