
In this paper, the stationarity of aggregate output is examined using the scaled variogram for a sample of twelve countries. It is argued that if the true data generating process of output is stationary around a deterministic trend with a change in mean and/or growth rate, the results of previous studies are biased. Once the authors allow for a one time exogenous 'shock,' the conclusions are indeed less clear cut and for some countries even reversed. Copyright 1994 by Ohio State University Press.
RANDOM-WALKS, UNIT-ROOT, GNP, PERMANENT, FLUCTUATIONS, TRANSITORY, TRENDS, MACROECONOMIC TIME-SERIES
RANDOM-WALKS, UNIT-ROOT, GNP, PERMANENT, FLUCTUATIONS, TRANSITORY, TRENDS, MACROECONOMIC TIME-SERIES
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
