
doi: 10.2307/1991690
This paper develops a theoretical model in which collateral is a mechanism for enforcing loan contracts. Collateral functions in two ways in the model. First, default on a loan triggers the loss of collateral value to the borrower, where this value is stochastic at the time when the loan is negotiated. The assignment of collateral provides incentive for the borrower to repay the loan. Second, default implies that the property nght to the collateral is transferred to the lender. The lender valuation of collateral, which may diverge from the borrower valuation, is also stochastic at the time of loan negotiation. The relation of lender to borrower valuation plays an important role in the loan process. If, because of costs of collection and marketing, moral hazard problems, or other types of "transaction costs," the lender valuation is much below the borrower valuation, then the process of default will entail dead-weight losses. Interest rates charged on loans will reflect these losses-appropriately weighted by the probability of default-and the expected interest charge paid by the borrower will be correspondingly above the underlying, transaction-cost-free rate of return. The more important these costs associated with default, the greater would be the dead-weight losses incurred and the amount of (otherwise) profitable loan opportunities foregone. Section 1 sets out the basic model and discusses the expected interest costs from the viewpoint of the borrower. Section 2 introduces transaction costs associated with default, discusses the expected interest return from the viewpoint of the lender, and analyzes the maximum size loan that would be issued by lenders on the basis of a given "quantity" of collateral. Section 3 uses the assumption that the lending industry yields a competitive rate of return to analyze the determination of
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 172 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
