
The primary aim of this paper is to study mappings J of rings that are additive and that satisfy the conditions $$ {\left( {{a^2}} \right)^J} = {\left( {{a^J}} \right)^2},\;{\left( {aba} \right)^J} = {a^J}{b^J}{a^J} $$ (1) Such mappings will be called Jordan homomorphisms. If the additive groups admit the operator 1/2 in the sense that 2x = a has a unique solution (1/2)a for every a, then conditions (1) are equivalent to the simpler condition $$ {\left( {ab} \right)^J} + {\left( {ba} \right)^J} = {a^J}{b^J} + {b^J}{a^J} $$ (2) Mappings satisfying (2) were first considered by Ancochea [1], [2](1). The modification to (1) is essentially due to Kaplansky [13]. Its purpose is to obviate the necessity of imposing any restriction on the additive groups of the rings under consideration.
rings, modules, fields
rings, modules, fields
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 148 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
