
doi: 10.2307/1968951
One finds in the literature a thorough-going discussion of rings without radical and with minimal condition for left ideals (semi-simple rings). For the structure of a ring whose quotient-ring with respect to the radical is semi-simple one can refer to the investigations of K6the (see K below). In this paper we shall examine the structure of a ring A with radical R D 0 and with minimal condition for left ideals ("general" MLI ring). The key-stone of our investigations is the fact that the radical of A is nilpotent, and this result we shall establish in ?1. In ?2 we shall prove that the sum of all minimal non-zero left ideals is a completely-reducible left ideal 9A, and in ?3 we shall examine the distribution of idempotent and nilpotent left ideals in 9)1. In ??4-6 we shall discuss the two "extreme cases": (1) when A is nilpotent, and (2) when A is idempotent. For a non-nilpotent A we shall prove that the existence of either a right-hand or a left-hand identity is sufficient for the existence of a composition series of left ideals of A. If A is any MLI ring, one can find a smallest exponent k such that Ak = Ak+l = ... . In ?7 we show that A is the sum of Ak (which is idempotent) and a nilpotent MLI ring. We wish to emphasize the fact that A is to be regarded throughout as a ring without operators. In ?8, however, we shall see that some of our most interesting results are valid for operator domains of a certain type. We conclude the Introduction with an explanation of our notation and terminology. Rings and subrings will usually be denoted by roman capitals; we shall use gothic letters when it is desirable to emphasize the fact that a subring is an ideal. By the statement "a is a left (right) ideal of A" we shall mean that a is an additive abelian group which admits the elements of A as left-hand (right-hand) operators. Observe that our definition does not' imply that a is a subring of A. The term "left ideal," with no qualifying phrase, will always mean "left ideal of the basic ring." A ring with minimal condition for left (right) ideals which are contained in itself will be called an MLI (MRI) ring. Finally we point out that if a and b are subrings of A, then [a, b] denotes the cross-cut of a and b, while (a, b) represents the compound (join) of a and b-i.e.
Abstract theory of rings, fields, etc.
Abstract theory of rings, fields, etc.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 147 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
