
doi: 10.2307/1933784
Synthetic laboratory strains of two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. confusum, were compared in terms of the voracity of larvae for eggs. Significant differences were observed between the species. Tribolium castaneum was much more cannibalistic with the greatest difference observed in 4— to 14—days—old larvae. Older active larvae of both species ate more eggs than did younger larvae. No significant differences were observed in the choice of eggs of both species when they were offered at the same time, but slightly more T. castaneum eggs were consumed than T. confusum eggs when larvae were supplied eggs of a single species. In one experiment a control series was maintained in the same manner as the experimental series, except that the larvae were not given eggs. Fecundity of adult T. castaneum emerging from these larvae was lower than in adults from the experimental series which had fed on eggs during the larval stage. No such difference was observed between experimental and control groups in T. confusum. It is suggested that differences in egg cannibalism by larvae of the two species of flour beetles may account in part for the superiority of T. castaneum in competition with T. confusum under the given conditions (29°C, to to 70% R. H.).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
