
doi: 10.2307/1912352
Sample selection bias as a specification error This paper discusses the bias that results from using non-randomly selected samples to estimate behavioral relationships as an ordinary specification error or «omitted variables» bias. A simple consistent two stage estimator is considered that enables analysts to utilize simple regression methods to estimate behavioral functions by least squares methods. The asymptotic distribution of the estimator is derived.
Linear regression; mixed models, Asymptotic Distribution, sample selection bias; specification error, Regression Methods, Behavioral Functions, Least Squares Methods, Specification Error, Applications of statistics to economics, Sample Selection Bias, Consistent Two Stage Estimator, jel: jel:C01, jel: jel:C13, jel: jel:C24
Linear regression; mixed models, Asymptotic Distribution, sample selection bias; specification error, Regression Methods, Behavioral Functions, Least Squares Methods, Specification Error, Applications of statistics to economics, Sample Selection Bias, Consistent Two Stage Estimator, jel: jel:C01, jel: jel:C13, jel: jel:C24
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
