It has recently been shown that the utility of playing a game with side payments depends on a parameter called strategic risk posture. The Shapley value is the risk neutral utility function for games with side payments. In this paper, utility functions are derived for bargaining games without side payments, and it is shown that these functions are also determined by the strategic risk posture. The Nash solution is the risk neutral utility function for bargaining games without side payments. RECENT WORK HAS SHOWN that the Shapley value for a game with side payments is a cardinal utility function which reflects the desirability of playing different positions in a game, or in different games (cf. Shapley [14], Roth [9]). A player's utility for playing some position in a game is determined in part by his assessment of the payoff he will receive in a class of games with side payments called bargaining games. Given a player's evaluation of these bargaining games, his utility for playing a position in any game with side payments can be determined (cf. Roth [11]). It is desirable to extend these results to games without side payments, since the assumption that side payments can be made is not appropriate in many situations. In this paper we will derive a class of utility functions for playing bargaining games without side payments. Games of this sort are studied by Nash [7], who developed a solution to bargaining games which is an extension of the Shapley value for games with side payments. That is, the Nash solution coincides with the Shapley value for bargaining games with side payments. Somewhat surprisingly, the utility of playing a bargaining game without side payments is determined by the same considerations which determine the utility of playing a game with side payments. Given a player's evaluation of bargaining games with side payments, his utility for bargaining without side payments is determined.