In Biblica 5I (I970) 235 f. I hope I proved the existence of a Greek "aorist participle of subsequent action." This construction, about which MOULTON had been sceptical, is important for Acts xvi 6 (xOu0OevrSq) and without it RAMSAY'S South Galatian theory, in which I firmly believe, runs into difficult waters. Although there are Latin parallels-using the perfect participle-I was at the time of writing that article unable to lay hands on a good example from the classical period. I think I can now supply one, from Pliny Natural History 8.I85: Germanici Caesaris manum aversatus est haut multo postea extincti1). Cf. also, in English, SHAKESPEARE, Antony and Cleopatra 3.6: "then does he say, he lent me some shipping unrestored."