Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Frond Articulation in Species of Polypodiaceae and Davalliaceae

Authors: D. A. Phillips; Richard A. White;

Frond Articulation in Species of Polypodiaceae and Davalliaceae

Abstract

Abscission, the natural detachment of a plant organ, is being studied by physiologists (e.g., Addicott, 1964; Rubinstein and Leopold, 1964; Jacobs and Kirk, 1966) after many years of interest on the part of morphologists. As new facts are discovered about growth-regulating substances, the physiological mechanisms governing senescence are becoming increasingly apparent. All such mechanisms must be correlated with anatomical characteristics of the abscission zone, thus necessitating a thorough knowledge of the cell types and patterns in this region of the plant. Miihldorf (1925) summarized the work done in the lower groups and also referred to the comprehensive coverage given to the higher plants: Monocotyledons (Bretfeld, 1880; Fouilloy, 1899) and dicotyledons (Tison, 1900; Lee, 1911). There are, however, several gaps in the anatomical literature concerning abscission, and one noticeable omission is a thorough description of the disarticulation of the rachis from the rhizome in ferns. In one early work (Basecke, 1908) three categories were described: (1) The frond falls before clear abscission lines are formed; (2) Disarticulation occurs along a line of cells present from the youngest stages; and (3) The frond disarticulates along a separation layer formed during maturity. Pfeiffer (1928, p. 163) examined other groups in addition to the ferns and established twelve classes of abscission based on various combinations of three characteristics of the separation layer. These included cell morphology, time of differentiation, and physiological condition of the cells after disarticulation. Most ferns are placed in class I of this system, in which the separation layer is formed by obtuse parenchyma, is evident as

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!