Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Biological Bulletinarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Biological Bulletin
Article
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
Biological Bulletin
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Effects of Spatial Distribution and Reproductive Biology on in situ Fertilization Rates of a Broadcast-Spawning Invertebrate

Authors: Coma, R.; Lasker, Howard Robert;

Effects of Spatial Distribution and Reproductive Biology on in situ Fertilization Rates of a Broadcast-Spawning Invertebrate

Abstract

In situ fertilization was examined in the gorgonian Pseudoplexaura porosa during 1994 and 1995 spawning events in the San Blas Islands, Panama, to assess spatial and temporal variation in fertilization success and to determine whether in situ fertilization was sperm limited. Fertilization rates did not differ significantly between years (60% vs. 55%), but monthly means were significantly different, ranging from 22% to 66%. Fertilization rate varied among days, ranging from 0 to 85%; 80% of this variability was explained by daily variation in the number of colonies that spawned. A weighted average of in situ fertilization rates suggests that 67% or more of spawned eggs are fertilized in nature. Sperm limitation did not occur on the nights when most of the colonies synchronously spawned and when most of the eggs were released. Eggs collected downstream of the population often had higher fertilization rates than eggs collected either adjacent to their source colony or eggs collected in the middle of the population, which indicates that in dense populations, eggs may have multiple opportunities to be fertilized. Traits such as highly synchronous spawning, high fecundity, large egg size, large polyps, and large colonies directly and indirectly enhance P. porosa gamete production and fertilization. These life-history traits reduce the effects of gamete dilution during spawning events and thus decrease the importance of sperm limitation in the population dynamics of P. porosa.

Country
Spain
Keywords

Source: Biodiversity Heritage Library, Source: BHL, Biodiversity, BHL-Corpus, Source: https://biodiversitylibrary.org

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    55
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
55
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
hybrid