Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Knit-Goods Industry in the Southern States

Authors: Ben F. Lemert;

The Knit-Goods Industry in the Southern States

Abstract

X southern states produce more than one-half of all the hosiery manufactured in the United States and two-thirds of all the cotton hosiery. North Carolina manufactures more cotton hosiery than any state in the Union, her production alone amounting to one third of the total American volume. Tennessee ranks second in the production of cotton hosiery, Georgia third, Illinois fourth, Pennsylvania fifth, and Alabama sixth. One-fifth of the total value of all knitgoods production in the United States in 1931 represented the value of knitgoods production in North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Virginia, Alabama, and South Carolina. Pennsylvania ranks first in the value of knit-goods production, New York second, North Carolina third, and Tennessee fourth. In hosiery, North Carolina is surpassed in value by Pennsylvania alone, Tennessee ranking third. New York owes her superiority in value to her wide variety and large volume of knit-goods other than hosiery. Pennsylvania holds her prominent position in total value of knit-goods production due to large volume and high quality. While there is still a wide margin between the figures representing total value of production in comparison of these states with North Carolina and Tennessee, such a margin may not be permanent. The six southern states outstanding in knit-goods production already embrace many mills manufacturing underwear, outerwear, k-nit-cloth, sports goods, gloves, and other articles. The manufacture of full-fashioned silk hosiery is spreading rapidly and using the most modern machines and processes. LOCATION

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!