Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Dental Anomalies in Caribou, Rangifer tarandus

Authors: F L, Miller; G D, Tessier;

Dental Anomalies in Caribou, Rangifer tarandus

Abstract

The dentitions of 43 of 1226 caribou (Rangifer tarandus) skulls examined had anomalies. Of the 43, 13 had supernumerary teeth, 25 had missing teeth, and five had extreme variations in root development and abnormal dentary patterns. These anomalies appear to be genetically produced and further study from the standpoint of evolutionary origin might be fruitful. sented. The 1176 caribou were taken from the Kaminuriak population, which calves and summers in the District of Keewatin, Northwest Territories, and winters for the most part in northwestern Manitoba and northeastern Saskatchewan. The 50 caribou were from a herd that is resident in north-central Baffin Island. Anomalies in the dentitions of Cervidae are generally uncommon. They are regularly reported in Odocoileus, a genus in which maxillary canines, in particular, appear with some frequency. Canines in the maxillae are normal in the genus Rangifer, the accepted dental formula for which is 0/3, 1/1, 3/3, 3/3 = 34 (Banfield, 1961:26). The associated maxillae, mandibles, and anomalous teeth were examined for evidence of the possible origin of anomalies from trauma. The incisiform teeth were extracted. The absence of normal sockets or the presence of extra sockets was determined, as was the possible migration of incisiform teeth due to the absence of one or more teeth from the incisiform row. The classification of the present or absent tooth was based on the form, size, and position of existing teeth.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Tooth, Supernumerary, Tooth Abnormalities, Deer, Genetics, Animals, Biological Evolution

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!