
and L. occidentalis Baker, a taxonomically valid species of tropical Africa and Madagascar related to L. hirsuta. Had he validly published his genus, like Trevisan he would have chosen L. aurita inferentially and incorrectly as lectotype. Underwood (I899, p. 255) also chose L. aurita as lectotype, but on an arbitrary (first cited species) basis, and so his choice should be disregarded. Maxon (I926, p. 429) was aware of all of the foregoing, except for the Brongniart choice of lectotype. And so he validated Trevisan's name by providing a generic description for it; the name must be cited as Anisosorus Trev. ex Maxon. He cited P. laciniata Willd. as the type, the sole species mentioned by Trevisan. The generic name Anisosorus, therefore, must be placed in synonymy under Lonchitis, which is now considered to contain two species: L. hirsuta L. and L. occidentalis Baker.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
