
doi: 10.2307/1192412
It seems most appropriate that the topic of this symposium is not simply judicial independence but judicial accountability as well. For while we want judges to be independent so that they can administer the law without fear of reprisal, we also want to find some way of controlling them. For independent power, as Jefferson wrote, is absolute power;1 there must be checks on judicial, as well as legislative and executive, authority. Our dilemma is like that of the King of Siam in Rogers and Hammerstein's play: Shall I join with other nations in alliance? If allies are weak, am I not best alone? If allies are strong, with power to protect me, Might they not protect me out of all I own?2
History, 330, Judicial process, Power, Comparative analysis, Judges & magistrates, Judicial power, Judges, Judiciary, Law
History, 330, Judicial process, Power, Comparative analysis, Judges & magistrates, Judicial power, Judges, Judiciary, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
