
doi: 10.2307/1087232
THE BASIC WEAKNESS Of ancient criticism is that the critics, rhetorically trained when they were not themselves teachers of rhetoric, concentrated all their attention on stylistic matters, often minutiae. On this subject they are often interesting, but they say very little on the essential nature and qualities of the genre, even of the author they are discussing. They are apt to treat literature as a storehouse of quotations to support their theories. The great exception is of course Aristotle, who in the Poetics deals with the essential nature of tragedy and, to a lesser extent, of comedy. His side comments on other genres, however, where he compares them to tragedy, are much less satisfying. This is particularly true of historiography. Two passages in the Poetics deal with it briefly. In the first (1451 b 1) he says:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
