The term producer surplus conventionally has been used to refer to the area above the competitive industry supply curve for output and below the equilibrium price. For the short run, there is general agreement as to the meaning of this area. In the short run, this area equals the payments to the firm in excess of the firm's total variable costs. Such payments are often referred to as quasirents. For the long run, there is no general agreement as to the meaning of this area. Some claim that this area has no particular meaning except under very special circumstances. For example, see Mishan [7, 221-22, 225-30] and Formby [1, 316, 323-24]. Others argue that this area is equal to the rents paid to factors of production. For example, see Shepherd [9] and Helmberger and Rosine [2].' Helmberger and Rosine [2] were the only ones to present an analytical example to support their position. They demonstrated that producer surplus will in fact equal rents if (i) an aggregate production function is used, (ii) the production function has four inputs, is of the Cobb-Douglas variety, and exhibits constant returns to scale, and (iii) two of the industry input supply functions are log-linear and two are perfectly elastic. The current paper brings the analysis down to the level of the individual firm, and significantly extends the result of Helmberger and Rosine [2]. It is demonstrated that producer surplus equals rents whenever the individual firm has a U-shaped long run average cost curve, regardless of (i) the form of the industry input supply functions, and (ii) the number of inputs. Throughout the paper, the analysis is general, that is, no specific functional forms are used.