
doi: 10.2298/aci0901081c
pmid: 19504994
Introduction: Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is defined as pelvis minor pain of nonmalignant nature repeating in different time intervals. Urethral syndrome (US) represents a most poorly defined entity within CPPS. Objective: The estimation of US influence on quality of-life as well as the determination of the way of treatment and therapy optimal length. Material and methods: A prospective one-year study included 166 men with CPPS, median age of 54 years; they were monitored clinically. During the patient monitoring the NIH-CPSI questionnaire (National Institute of Health- Chronic Prostatis Symptom Index) was used. US was diagnosed in 79 patients (47%), and according to the most intensive pain localization they were divided into three groups. All the patients were treated with alpha adrenergic blockers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and the treatment of the patients with positive urethral smear also included antibiotherapy. The values of total NIHCPSI, as well as of its individual components were analyzed after three and six months of treatment. Results and discussion: The therapy application had a significant influence on the decrease of total NIH-CPSI - 23.3% (p<0,01), pain symptoms (p<0.0) and urinary difficulties (p<0.01), and the point values of quality-of-life score were diminished by 0.7 to 1.9 points depending on the group of those monitored (p<0.01). Conclusion: Our study indicated a significant influence of CPPS on quality-of-life and a necessity of a serious approach to patients and their treatment.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Chronic Disease, Urethral Diseases, Quality of Life, Humans, Middle Aged, Pelvic Pain, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Chronic Disease, Urethral Diseases, Quality of Life, Humans, Middle Aged, Pelvic Pain, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
