The authors of the current article examine the right to information in criminal proceedings regarding the confiscation of criminally acquired property. The paper provides a detailed overview of the legislative development in Latvia, with a focus on the evolution of Section 627 of the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), as well as analysis of case law by the Constitutional Court. The authors explore the application of Directive 2014/42/EU, the role of judicial control, and the impact of procedural safeguards on the rights of affected persons. Particular attention is paid to procedural distinctions between different types of proceedings, including those initiated during pre-trial investigation. The findings highlight ongoing challenges in practice, despite improvements in legal regulation, emphasizing the importance of ensuring equal access to information for all parties involved in the confiscation of criminal assets.