
In the context of research and development, it is key to achieve accurate and reliable results. However, often to obtain these results, a large number of experiments must be performed, which can significantly extend the research time and increase computational requirements. The solution to these problems may be efficient experimental planning, which allows for a reduction in the number of trials and optimization of the process. This article provides an insight into Central Composite Design (CCD) and its use in simulation experiments. We introduce various types of CCD designs, such as CCC (Central Composite Circumscribed), CCF (Central Composite Face centered), and CCI (Central Composite Inscribed), and analyze their use in creating second-order regression models. We also discuss the specific advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, as well as their possible alternatives, such as the Draper-Lin CCD design.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
