
Keynesian economists have generally supported quantitative easing (QE) on groundsit increases aggregate demand and anything that increases demand at this time of demand shortage is welcome. This paper argues that response may be misplaced. QE may back fire with respect to demand stimulus, create potentially significant future dangers, and is supportive of a plutocratic political economy based on “asset market trickle-down” that obstructs needed policy change.
quantitative easing, monetary policy, asset prices, jel: jel:E50, jel: jel:E43, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:E58
quantitative easing, monetary policy, asset prices, jel: jel:E50, jel: jel:E43, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:E58
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
