
This work aimed to investigate the ability of different formulations of bioactive glass (BAG)-S53P4 to interfere with bacterial biofilm produced on prosthetic material by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antibiofilm activity of three formulations of bioglass was assessed at different time points through two different analyses: Crystal Violet and confocal laser scanning microscopy assays.Significant differences in the whole biofilm were observed between BAG-S53P4-treated and control samples, while no marked changes in antibiofilm activity were observed among the tested formulations. Data from colorimetric assay were confirmed by confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis, which evidenced the significant reduction in biomass and a decrease of total cell volume when both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilms were treated with BAG-S53P4.BAG-S53P4 can be considered as an excellent adjuvant in the treatment of prosthetic infections related to biofilm.
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Microscopy, Confocal, bacterial biofilm; bioactive glass; confocal laser scanning microscopy; prosthetic joint infections; prosthetic materials, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Prostheses and Implants, Staphylococcal Infections, Bacterial Adhesion, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Biofilms, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Humans, Pseudomonas Infections, Biomass, Glass
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Microscopy, Confocal, bacterial biofilm; bioactive glass; confocal laser scanning microscopy; prosthetic joint infections; prosthetic materials, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Prostheses and Implants, Staphylococcal Infections, Bacterial Adhesion, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Biofilms, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Humans, Pseudomonas Infections, Biomass, Glass
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 72 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
