Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Magnification in cholangiography

Authors: DM Nichols; HJ Burhenne;

Magnification in cholangiography

Abstract

The degree of magnification in radiographic imaging of the bile duct has not been sufficiently emphasized. Differences in magnification account for much of the considerable discrepancy among various radiographic and nonradiographic measurements of size. In measuring a series of 22 freshly extracted common bile duct stones, an average magnification factor of 1.43 (43%) was found on fluoroscopic spot films; this compares with the 1.3 (30%) magnification generally accepted as being present in conventional intravenous cholangiography using the overhead-tube technique. The large magnification factor must be remembered in interpreting fluoroscopic images of the bile duct. Most published dimensions are meaningless unless accompanied by a statement of technique and magnification factor.

Keywords

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Optics and Photonics, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Gallstones, Radiographic Magnification, Cholangiography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?