
pmid: 6978026
The relation between fetal head circumference and menstrual age was determined by cross-sectional analysis of 400 fetuses (15-41 weeks) examined with a linear array real-time (dynamic image) scanner using specifically defined methodology. Mathematical modeling of the data demonstrated that the head circumference growth curve is nonlinear, similar to the biparietal diameter growth curve. Both the linear quadratic (r2 = 98.3%) and linear cubic (r2 = 98.3%) functions could be considered the optimal model. Predicted head circumference values for the linear cubic function were comparable to established normal values on the basis of postnatal measurements at 25-40 weeks (mean difference, -0.94 mm; SD, 0.47 mm). Predicted menstrual age values (+/- 2 SD) associated with a given head circumference measurement were calculated and are presented in tabular form. The use of the head circumference measurement in predicting menstrual age, estimating fetal weight, and in detecting intrauterine growth retardation is discussed.
Fetal Growth Retardation, Fetus, Time Factors, Cephalometry, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Gestational Age, Menstruation, Ultrasonography
Fetal Growth Retardation, Fetus, Time Factors, Cephalometry, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Gestational Age, Menstruation, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 198 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
