Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Curved Stylet Core Biopsy Results in Larger Cores

Authors: Adib R, Karam; Wadicar, Nugent; Ashraf, Khan; Diana, Desai; Sridhar, Shankar;

Curved Stylet Core Biopsy Results in Larger Cores

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the size of biopsy cores obtained using a biopsy needle before and after manual curving of its inner stylet.A total of 40 open renal biopsies were randomly performed on two ex vivo beef kidneys using four different semiautomated cutting needles. Two 18-gauge and two 20-gauge needles were used; one needle of each gauge had its inner stylet manually curved. Ten biopsy specimens were obtained using each needle and then were put into four different formalin containers, one for each needle, and sent to the pathology laboratory. Two pathologists who were blinded to the corresponding needles reviewed the samples in consensus and measured the dimensions of obtained cores.The mean diameter of the cores was larger when curved needles were used: for the 18-gauge needles, the core diameters were 0.866 mm for the curved needle and 0.688 mm for the straight needle, and for the 20-gauge needles, the core diameters were 0.522 mm for the curved needle and 0.480 mm for the straight needle. The length of the samples was also longer when they were obtained using the curved needle. When we considered the cores as cylinders, the calculated volumes of samples obtained using the curved needles were significantly larger.Manually curving of the inner stylet of the cutting biopsy needle results in larger cores, in terms of diameter and length, and results in significantly larger overall volume.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Disease Models, Animal, Needles, Biopsy, Needle, Animals, Cattle, Equipment Design, Kidney

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!