
doi: 10.22037/uj.v4i3.112
pmid: 17987574
Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery for the management of ureteral calculi.We performed 123 laparoscopic calculus removal in 103 men and 31 women. Indications for the procedure were extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or transureteral lithotomy failure and large calculus. The mean age of the patients was 39.6 +/- 13.8 years. The calculi were between 1 and 5.6 cm and located in the upper, middle, and lower ureter in 90 (73.2%), 20 (16.3%), and 13 (10.5%) patients, respectively. Ureteral stent was used in 52 (42.3%) patients. We used 3 ports for camera and instruments. Intraperitoneal approach was used in 104 (84.6%) and extraperitoneal in 19 (15.4%).The mean operative time was 143.2 +/- 60.5 minutes. One hundred and nineteen patients (96.7%) became stone free. Minor complications occurred in 14 (11.4%) patients. Conversion to open surgery was required in 1 patient due to migration of the calculus to the peritoneum after removal from the ureter. Intra-abdominal hematoma led to reoperation 1 day after the surgery in 1 patient. Operative time was different significantly between extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches (171.3 +/- 91.3 minutes and 137.3 +/- 52.2 minutes, respectively; P = .02).Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic removal of ureteral calculi in selected groups of patients, taking the advantage of this minimally invasive procedure such as better cosmetic results and patient's satisfaction.
Adult, Male, Ureteral Calculi, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology, Radiography, Child, Preschool, Humans, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Female, Laparoscopy, Stents, RC870-923, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Ureteral Calculi, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology, Radiography, Child, Preschool, Humans, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Female, Laparoscopy, Stents, RC870-923, Child, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
