Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://dx.doi.org/1...arrow_drop_down
https://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag...
Other literature type . 1997
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

PANEL DATA AND EULER EQUATIONS

Authors: Ligon, Ethan; Ligon, Ethan;

PANEL DATA AND EULER EQUATIONS

Abstract

PANEL DATA A N D EULER ETHAN LIGON EQUATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION Dynamic rational expectations models featuring agents w i t h addi- tively time-separable u t i l i t y functions typically yield some sort of mar­ tingale restriction which may be used for either testing the model or estimating its parameters. W h i l e different models may yield a variety of these sorts of restrictions, the one most commonly observed is the Euler equation. Martingale restrictions are exceptionally useful i n a t i m e series con­ text, since the martingale property delivers a very useful sort of i n ­ dependence. However, as noted by Chamberlain (1984), this indepen­ dence property does not extend to the analysis of panel data. Most panels have many agents observed over a small number of t i m e peri­ ods. For these data, the most natural asymptotic theory would hold the number of t i m e periods ( T ) fixed, while l e t t i n g the number of agents (JV) approach infinity. However, when working w i t h the Euler equation or similar restrictions, this procedure w i l l yield inconsistent estimators whenever there are i m p o r t a n t aggregate components to the innovations observed by each agent (Pakes 1994). This paper develops a characterization of estimators t h a t rely on N oo, but which hold T fixed. I n particular, we show t h a t l i m i t i n g estimator is a random variable, and show how to calculate its distribu­ t i o n when there are overidentifying restrictions. W h e n the distribution of the l i m i t i n g estimator is nondegenerate, the estimator cannot be consistent, but knowledge of this d i s t r i b u t i o n permits us to engage i n the usual sort of inference and hypothesis testing. 2. M O D E L Suppose t h a t we have a dataset of observations on N agents over the course of T periods. A n economic model implies t h a t Vu = f(x , it b ) + u , it Date: May, 1997.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

rational expectations, economic models, rational expectations, Demand and Price Analysis, economic models

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities