Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Asphalt Content by Ignition Round Robin Study

Authors: Brown, E.R.; Mager, Stuart;

Asphalt Content by Ignition Round Robin Study

Abstract

The National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) has developed a test method to determine the asphalt content of hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures by ignition. In the ignition method, a HMA sample is subjected to 5380C (lOOO0F) in a furnace to ignite and burn the asphalt cement from the aggregate. The difference in weight of the sample before and after ignition is used to determine the asphalt content of the mixture. The aggregate recovered after ignition testing may then be used for gradation analysis. A round robin study was completed by NCAT to determine the accuracy and precision of the ignition method. This paper discusses the round robin test program and the accuracy and precision values determined for the measured asphalt content and gradation by the ignition method. Equipment developed for the procedure was purchased by NCAT with funds provided by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), NAPA Research and Education Foundation, and the Alabama Department of Transportation (ADOT). The equipment was provided along with laboratory prepared HMA samples to 12 participating laboratories throughout the U. S. Four replicates of four HMA mixtures containing different aggregates types, gradations and asphalt contents were provided for testing. The results of the round robin study show that the ignition method can accurately measure the AC content of HMA mixtures with greater precision than solvent extraction methods without significantly affecting the gradation of the aggregate. This test method has shown excellent potential for replacing existing test methods for measuring asphalt content.

NCAT No.95-3

Keywords

Asphalt content, Materials tests

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!