Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PubMed Centralarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lymphocyte‐to‐C‐reactive Protein Ratio as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Received Curative Treatment

Authors: YAMAMOTO, SOSUKE; AOYAMA, TORU; MAEZAWA, YUKIO; HASHIMOTO, ITARU; ESASHI, RYUKI; KAZAMA, KEISUKE; UCHIYAMA, MAMORU; +7 Authors

Lymphocyte‐to‐C‐reactive Protein Ratio as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Received Curative Treatment

Abstract

Background/Aim: Lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) is a useful biomarker for predicting the prognosis of various cancers. This study examined the effect of LCR on the oncological prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection at our institution and considered the mechanisms involved. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 258 subjects were selected from the medical records of patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University between 2005 and 2020. The LCR was calculated using the following formula: LCR=lymphocyte count (number/μl)/C-reactive protein (mg/dl). Results: The cutoff value for LCR was set at 9,000, and 258 patients were classified into the LCR-low (<9,000) (58 patients) and LCR-high (>9,000) (200 patients) groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the two groups were compared. The 5-year overall survival rate was 54.2% in the LCR-low group and 75.2% in the LCR-high group (p<0.001), and a multivariate analysis showed that it was a useful prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR)=1.744, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.009-3.014, p=0.046]. In addition, with regard to RFS, there was a significant difference in the 5-year RFS between the LCR-low group (50.4%) and the LCR-high group (72.3%) (p<0.001). Regarding the comparison of the postoperative clinical course between the two groups, the peritoneal recurrence rate was 24.1% in the LCR-low group and 7.5% in the LCR-high group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Preoperative LCR is a useful prognostic factor for predicting the oncological prognosis of patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative resection. Thus, the LCR may be a useful tool for the treatment and perioperative management of patients with gastric cancer.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Research Article

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research